Friday, January 25, 2013
Wednesday, January 23, 2013
So Mandi and I are going to be posting sporadically for awhile. We're both pretty busy right now, and we're experimenting with time management and priorities.
Here are a couple of stories I've found interesting to tide you over:
Monday, January 21, 2013
Friday, January 18, 2013
Wednesday, January 16, 2013
Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Apparently many Americans - and not just fringe-y scary ones - have an affinity for or emotional attachment to guns. But the level of actual regulation on guns is simply topsy turvy, considering the amount of danger they present to people (especially children).
So I wanted to pull together a bunch of ideas I've seen floating around to underscore just how under-regulated guns are in America.
Ten things that are more regulated than guns:
Monday, January 14, 2013
|Yes, for those of you who were wondering, it's tape over them.|
The proper answer, as everyone knows to reply out loud and in public, is never. However, there is always a private, whispered, "... but...., if s/he was really drunk, dressed inappropriately, if I could see their ankles, on the wrong side of town, etc. wasn't s/he really asking for it?"
Friday, January 11, 2013
So what are people saying about guns, now that some time has passed since Sandy Hook Elementary's tragedy? The Obama Administration seems to be coming down to proposals on universal background checks (which like 85% of people support and a whole lot of people think is already the law - it's not, there are gun-show and internet loopholes) and banning high-capacity magazines, but abandoning the assault weapons ban. If you disagree with that, the time to let people know is now. Here's what people have been talking about, about guns...
- Conspiracy Brother Alex Jones (he gets uber-scary starting at the 2-minute mark) -
Thursday, January 10, 2013
|Even the dog knows the routine...|
Imagine going outside your house to take the trash out, and the police stopping you to pat you down. Imagine going for a stroll around your block, and the cops ask you for your identification. Imagine going to your significant other's house, and being arrested for trespassing. For millions of New Yorkers, these scenarios are no figment of their imagination, it is an everyday reality. And everyone else seem pretty ok with that.
Wednesday, January 9, 2013
So I'm watching the Daily Show last night, and Jon Stewart does a pretty awesome job unpacking the sheer irrationality of our political culture about gun control...
Which made me want to talk about the top 5 mindsets that are driving me nuts this week.
Tuesday, January 8, 2013
It's an idea that draws wide support from people of all ideological stripes. The idea that we should have mandatory drug testing for all people applying to welfare, and deny those who fail the drug test any benefits. Some states, such as Florida, have recently tried to implement testing, to mixed results. Should we drug test welfare recipients?
Monday, January 7, 2013
Friday, January 4, 2013
I know, it's Friday, and you want your Follies. But we've done a few extra follies lately, and I want to get one more re-run in before we go back to our normal schedule. This is the second of my SCOTUS background pieces. This one (from June 6th) is about the current justices, and how this Roberts Court stacks up versus prior Courts...
My kids ate my homework. Okay, no, but boy did they get in the way of me doing any kind of efficient writing in the past two days. Until the fall I am first a mom at just about all times, and only secondly, well, a person who can do things like write cogent sentences without being interrupted constantly, particularly when my kids are low on sleep and wearing their cranky pants. But bear with me for one more bit of background, because it really does help in any discussion about the Court to know something about the personalities and histories of the current justices.
First a note about terminology: There are no liberals on the Court right now,
Thursday, January 3, 2013
In preparation for more Court-watching soon, I thought it's worthwhile to revisit my 2-part series from June on the Supreme Court. Today's edition revisits the law...
I'd like to talk some about the Supreme Court this week. But first I think it's worthwhile for those of us who aren't particularly focused on the Supreme Court (and really, how many of us are), to talk a bit about the Court and its current members. These are probably things you learned about at some point in school, but like with me and anything to do with chemistry or calculus, they may have been tossed by your brain to make room for things you use more. Like 1980s song lyrics. Seriously, when the kids get to chemistry and calculus it's going to be painful. But if they would like to know the words to every Madonna song, I've got it covered.
Wednesday, January 2, 2013
It's something I think about a lot, and it spawned some good discussion last time, so I thought we should revisit Mandi's Post (from June 26th) about whether women can have it all...
P.S. And speaking about having it all... Please get well soon, Hillary. P.P.S. Please shut up everybody who is dogging Hillary while she's ill. Get a life. Now without further ado -
I thought it was a good time to chat about the article that has been making waves around the internet recently, the Atlantic article on why women can’t have it all. This type of article, in various permutations, has been coming out yearly for a while now. In the beginning, it was penned by men, then by women. Either which way, someone is always willing to wag their finger in women’s faces and admonish them for thinking that they “can have it all”.
I confess I’m not sure what that means.